I Helped Eric Metaxas Dream Up a Talk Show in 2008. I Hardly Recognize Him Now.

From persuasion to provocation, and what it says about the state of public faith.

Yesterday, The Guardian ran a piece about The Talk Show with Eric Metaxas, a conservative backed late night talk show pilot that failed to get picked up. For most readers, it is a small media curiosity. For me, it is personal.

Back in 2008, I worked with Eric during the early planning stages of a talk show concept. We never filmed a single episode, but we spent hours brainstorming ideas, sketching formats, and dreaming about what thoughtful public conversation could look like. The goal was to create a space where faith, art, and culture could meet with humor and humility. We wanted a show that could persuade, not provoke.

Eric Metaxas and me in 2009 in the SNL writers room

Seeing Eric now hosting something so different in tone and spirit feels like watching an old friend trade curiosity for combat.

---

The Eric I Knew

The Eric I knew was endlessly curious. He loved ideas and laughter in equal measure. His early projects, from Socrates in the City to his writing on Wilberforce and Bonhoeffer, reflected a kind of confidence that comes from believing truth can withstand a good question.

He modeled a version of Christianity that was serious without being severe, principled without being performative. He could make people who disagreed with him feel heard, even valued.

In those early conversations about our talk show, the word “enemy” never came up. We talked about connection, about the value of making space for people who were skeptical of faith or tired of the noise. The premise was simple but radical in hindsight - you can be faithful without being combative.

---

From Persuasion to Provocation

Something changed.

Over the past fifteen years, Eric has shifted from dialogue to declaration, from grace to grievance. The tone of his public life has hardened, as if disagreement itself became a kind of betrayal.

The pivot was on full display in 2020 when he punched a protester outside the Republican National Convention. It was jarring not only because of the act itself, but because it so vividly contradicted the gentleness and wit that once defined him.

That moment was not just about politics. It symbolized a deeper transformation, a move from persuasion to provocation, from seeing opponents as neighbors to seeing them as threats.

---

The Irony of the Culture War

It is ironic that the phrase “culture war” was coined by sociologist James Davison Hunter, who used it to describe the polarization he wanted Christians to transcend.

In To Change the World, Hunter argued that lasting cultural influence does not come from winning wars but from what he called “faithful presence.” True influence, he wrote, is rooted in proximity, humility, and excellence — in showing up, doing good work, and serving the common good.

That idea once animated Eric’s best work. When we were sketching out ideas in 2008, we imagined a show built on faithful presence, not victory laps. We believed humor and thoughtfulness could coexist. That laughter could be a form of grace.

But faithful presence does not drive clicks. Outrage does. And outrage is the currency of the modern culture war.

---

Bonhoeffer and the Danger of Simplified Courage

That transformation is especially painful because Bonhoeffer was supposed to be Eric’s moral north star.

Yet many Bonhoeffer scholars, including Clifford Green and Victoria Barnett, have criticized his biography for flattening the theologian’s complexity and turning him into a partisan symbol. They point out that Bonhoeffer’s courage was grounded in humility, doubt, and deep theological wrestling, not in self righteous certainty.

The danger of simplifying Bonhoeffer is the same danger we see in much of Christian public life today, the temptation to turn moral conviction into branding. The more we turn prophets into mascots, the less prophetic they become.

---

Why This Still Matters

I do not write any of this out of bitterness. I write it out of sadness and maybe still some hope.

I have seen the other Eric. The one who could charm a room with a joke and make an atheist pause with an honest question. The one who believed that faith, if true, had nothing to fear from scrutiny.

That version of Eric understood something we are rapidly forgetting. Persuasion is not weakness. Grace is not compromise. And faithful presence, the kind Hunter described, is still the most powerful way to change hearts and minds.

---

The Hope Beyond the War

When we sat around those tables in 2008, tossing around ideas for a talk show that would bridge faith and culture, none of us imagined it would end up here, not in another round of the culture war, but in a moment that seems to have lost the plot entirely.

The tragedy of The Talk Show with Eric Metaxas is not that it failed to find a network. It is that it represents the end of something that once held such promise, a vision of faith that could engage, not attack, laugh, not lash out.

Bonhoeffer’s legacy reminds us that courage without humility is just noise. And Hunter’s sociology still holds true. Culture changes not through conquest, but through character.

If we really want to shape the world, we will have to remember what Eric once knew, that grace persuades longer than anger performs.