I highly encourage my readers to check out this interview with Joel Hunter in Christianity Today. Here is an excerpt:

Where do evangelicals fit in the future of politics?

We just turned a huge corner here. This is not an election that was won by inciting the base. The future will not be built by inciting the base, either on the right or the left. We have to determine whether we're going to cooperate without compromising our values and ideals. There will be those who want to be the voice crying in the darkness. That's fine, but they will prove themselves politically marginalized. There is great potential for the church to be part of the solution to the problems in our culture and the problems in our world if we can build coalitions that help enhance the common good that also enhances the Christian social agenda. read more »

I have been rather remiss in not posting much during this campaign season. I have spent the past two months working in NYC but also have been sickened by the tenor of this campaign. Going into this campaign, I and many others would have predicted a much more civil and reasonable campaign because of both candidates. Sadly that has not been the case. I think much of this can be blamed upon the entire system of political consultants and the media. But at the end of the day the buck has to stop with the candidate.

It has been very difficult to cut through all of the hysterical campaigning on both sides to get at the reasons to vote for either candidate. I am neither convinced that McCain is Bush III/Four More Years nor am I convinced that Obama is a closet Muslim. But I would like to give my take on the pros and cons of each candidate.

Barack Obama
Pros read more »

Today I had the pleasure to meet and interview the incomparable Eric Metaxas. Eric is a voice that needs to be heard in our culture. In this interview we discuss his latest books It's Time To Sleep, My Love and Amazing Grace (a biography of William Wilberforce), his work with Socrates In The City, and his thoughts on our current election. read more »

Yesterday I had the pleasure of meeting Daniel Radosh, author of the new book Rapture Ready. Daniel wrote the book to investigate Christian pop culture and came away surprised at what he found. I highly recommend checking out his book.

Daniel and I had a great time discussing the "Culture War" and civility in the public arena. While I am sure that Daniel and I have many differences, I couldn't have found a better guy to enjoy a morning chat with.

My friend Jeff Shinabarger wrote a very thought provoking post earlier this week about community in the wake of tornadoes that came through his neighborhood in East Atlanta. His post ended up being a great topic of discussion with my posse this week and prompted these thoughts from me:

I've been thinking about this idea of community for years and I can't quite put my finger on what has caused a general decline in the sense of community. Many people talk about the rise of suburbs or wealth as primary reasons but I think that those are but small contributing factors. Many of my friends grew up in suburban neighborhoods in Atlanta or elsewhere and had a tremendous sense of community. I know that I did in my prototypical suburban neighborhood. In my cul-de-sac infested suburban sprawl neighborhood, I have at one point been inside every single house in that neighborhood and dozens in surrounding neighborhoods. And not just those where my friends lived. There was a sense as a kid that I could get in almost as much trouble with another adult in the neighborhood as with my parents; parents weren't afraid to actually discipline other people's kids even if they hardly knew them. I have talked about these experiences with friends who grew up in other parts of the country, with friends who grew up in poverty stricken neighborhoods, and those who grew up around the country club and while the details may differ, the general experience of community was the same. read more »

A friend of mine posed these very thought-provoking questions:

I have a question for any Obama voters from one who is sympathetic to Obama, has defended him on many occasions, voted for him in the primary, but isn't sure that he could ever vote for him in the general election:

Four observations and then a question:

1) Today NARAL endorsed Obama.
2) The New York Times recently reported that the Obama campaign will make abortion an issue in the general election in an effort to draw independent and Republican moderate women who may be uncomfortable with the prospect of Roe v. Wade being overturned.
3) Obama voted against Roberts and Alito. Let me focus on Roberts: eminently experienced, qualified, and respected across the board. In my estimation, there was no reason to vote against him unless you were making abortion a litmus test. Keep in mind that there is a long precedent of giving the president some respect in terms of Supreme Ct. nominees. This explains why John McCain voted for Ginsburg and Breyer despite disagreeing with them on abortion.
4) Obama has never voted against any abortion measure, including partial birth abortion.

So...

How does this fit with Obama's post-partisan political persona? Isn't this just hardball partisan politics because no one could get the Democratic nomination without capitulating to the pro-choice lobby? Wouldn't it be more consistent with his post-partisanship to say: "You know what? 2/3 of Americans are against partial birth abortion. We need to respect that and find some common ground. Etc. Etc."

This is a big, big problem for me. Discuss...

I am in the midst of reading Os Guinness's new book, The Case for Civility. I have had high expectations for this book and so far I am not disappointed. In my mind, Guinness is the foremost expert of this topic, which is too often misunderstood. He makes this point in the first chapter.

"This short essay is a proposal for restoring civility in America, as one model for fostering civility around the world and helping to make the world safe for diversity. But civility must truly be restored. Is it not to be confused with niceness and mere etiquette or dismissed and squeamishness about differences. It is a tough, robust, substantive concept that is a republican virtue, critical to both democracy and civil society, and a manner of conduct that will be decisive for the future of the American republic." read more »

My good friend Glenn Lucke sent me this excellent interview that he has conducted over the past few months with noted sociologist Michael Lindsay (for the record, Glenn recently attained his Ph.D in Sociology from University of Virginia while working with James Davison Hunter; Glenn is also wicked smart). I read Michael's book back in the fall and while I wasn't blown away, the depth of research in the book is very impressive.

Below is Glenn's introduction along with the first half of the interview. I will post the second half of the interview tomorrow. I welcome all comments especially those from readers of Glenn's blog, Common Grounds Online.

---

Michael Lindsay, a sociologist at Rice University, recently published Faith in the Halls of Power: How Evangelicals Joined America’s Elite. The endorsements for this book demonstrate that historians and sociologists of American religion are taking Lindsay and his work seriously.

For this project, Lindsay interviewed 360 evangelical elites in business, politics, academia and entertainment/media. While his labors in this regard are impressive (it is difficult to get access to many of these leaders), and have garnered most of the publicity that I’ve seen, a greater strength of the book in my estimation is the vast amount of history, sociology and political science scholarship that Lindsay read and synthesized. The breadth and depth of Lindsay’s work commend it to specialists. read more »

A friend of mine sent me this story this morning:

"Controversial: Dr Rowan Williams believes the introduction of Sharia law to Britain will help maintain social cohesion

The Archbishop of Canterbury has today said that the adoption of Islamic Sharia law in the UK is "unavoidable" and that it would help maintain social cohesion.

Rowan Williams told BBC Radio 4's World At One that the UK has to "face up to the fact" that some of its citizens do not relate to the British legal system.

He says that Muslims could choose to have marital disputes or financial matters dealt with in a Sharia court.

He says Muslims should not have to choose between "the stark alternatives of cultural loyalty or state loyalty". read more »