I am often accused of being a right-wing conservative "Rethuglican" by those on the Left and a bleeding heart commie liberal by people on the Right. And the synthesis of these criticisms often make me out to be a moderate. While I am certainly not a moderate, I very much believe that we need moderate rhetoric and temperament in our political dialog and debate.

A good friend of mine made this case far better than I can so have I included it below:

What bothers me is the absence of moderation--not necessarily in terms of political views but in terms of temperament and judgment--that is highlighted by shrill, self-promoting Manichean partisans like Malkin, Coulter, Olbermann, Maddow, etc.

Honestly I don't remember a time in recent memory where I was less interested in politics. I'm not saying this is all good. After all, this is a time when our country is having big debates over important issues like health care. One big reason is that I still believe that the differences between our political parties, while real, are exaggerated. I realize that both sides vote differently (sometimes) and offer different agendas (if at all consistent)--but the reality is that together they have created the political culture in which major decisions are made and legislation is crafted. It's not just that they are bought and paid for by their respective interests and indulge in brazen hypocrisy as we've seen in the case of Christopher Dodd--though that's certainly the case. It's not simply the seduction of greed, perks and influence, though that certainly seems true. I'm thinking about how the Republican Party and Democratic Party have together created the channels and culture in which they operate, debate, compromise, pass legislation, and indulge in institutionalized, legal corruption. All this in an environment in which the electoral process powerfully shapes how decisions are made and votes are cast. The bailout vote in October was a powerful expression of this--Obama, McCain, Pelosi, Reid, Bush, the Republican leadership--all game and all in need of each other to support this. These parties are in a death spiral together and as Will has experienced and pointed out before, they control the electoral levers to prevent serious reform in the form of a major third party. read more »

Items mentioned in this video:

• Jon Meacham's Newsweek article
• Joe Scarborough video with Jon Meacham and Tim Keller
• Michael Spencer's article "The Coming Evangelical Collapse"
• "UnChristian" by Gabe Lyons and Dave Kinnaman
• Bill Simmons: "Choosing my EPL team"
• Liverpool FC
• Unibroue Trois Pistoles

In order for this to be a conversation, I need your help and participation. While most people are comfortable with text comments on blogs, I think we miss out on the spoken word and hearing from real people. As such I would ask that you click the icon below to be connected to my voicemail to leave your thoughts on this week's topic. While I would prefer that you leave your name and where you are calling from, it isn't required. read more »

I highly encourage my readers to check out this interview with Joel Hunter in Christianity Today. Here is an excerpt:

Where do evangelicals fit in the future of politics?

We just turned a huge corner here. This is not an election that was won by inciting the base. The future will not be built by inciting the base, either on the right or the left. We have to determine whether we're going to cooperate without compromising our values and ideals. There will be those who want to be the voice crying in the darkness. That's fine, but they will prove themselves politically marginalized. There is great potential for the church to be part of the solution to the problems in our culture and the problems in our world if we can build coalitions that help enhance the common good that also enhances the Christian social agenda. read more »

I have been rather remiss in not posting much during this campaign season. I have spent the past two months working in NYC but also have been sickened by the tenor of this campaign. Going into this campaign, I and many others would have predicted a much more civil and reasonable campaign because of both candidates. Sadly that has not been the case. I think much of this can be blamed upon the entire system of political consultants and the media. But at the end of the day the buck has to stop with the candidate.

It has been very difficult to cut through all of the hysterical campaigning on both sides to get at the reasons to vote for either candidate. I am neither convinced that McCain is Bush III/Four More Years nor am I convinced that Obama is a closet Muslim. But I would like to give my take on the pros and cons of each candidate.

Barack Obama
Pros read more »

When did we become a country that punishes the good and rewards the bad? I know this is hyperbole but sometimes I think this isn't far from the truth. I do not like to see people suffer and I do believe that we need some basic social safety net. I just not understand why those who have been responsible must bear the burden.

Today's New York Times:

As the Treasury Department prepares a $40 billion program to help delinquent homeowners avoid foreclosure, it confronts a difficult challenge: not making the plan too tempting to people like Todd Lawrence.

“Why am I being punished for having bought a house I could afford?” he asked. “I am beginning to think I would have rocks in my head if I keep paying my mortgage.”

But the benefits of a bailout for his neighbors seem ephemeral to the 45-year-old Mr. Lawrence, especially because he figures the cost of helping them will come, one way or another, out of his pocket as a taxpayer. “I’m basically financing my own financial destruction,” he said.

Yesterday I picked up a copy of Good magazine. I had heard a little about Good but didn't know much. I am pretty inclined to like any publication that sets out to celebrate and educate about doing good.

Unfortunately my hopeful thoughts came to an end after reading the insipid election edition. The cover story lists 1,565 reasons to vote in this year's election. However, had Good decided to be more honest, they would have entitled the article "Reasons to Vote for Obama".

Let me first state that while I do not support Obama, neither do I support McCain. The Republicans have been a disaster over the past 8 years. However, I find it rather disingenuous for this magazine to devote an election edition to giving reasons to vote for one candidate.

Don't believe me? Here is a pretty representative sampling of some of the reasons to vote: read more »

The problem with the guilt by association story regarding Wright and Ayers is that is assumes that we can read the mind of Obama and know his "true" motivations. It assumes that more than simply being a rather left wing politician, that he is particularly deceptive and sinister in his ultimate goals.

I had an interesting FB comment exchange with some "true believers" last night. I found this rather enlightening and disturbing.

Walt - Gotta agree with Mary Katherine Ham: the Obama campaign is predictably whiny about Ayers: http://is.gd/3xgw.via Twitter - 11:05pm

Will Hinton at 11:09pm October 4
The Ayers story is a non-story.

George Lincoln at 11:12pm October 4
obama's strong ties to terrorist William Ayres is a non-story only to those who want black moslem leader barack hussein osama obama bin ladden to sieze control over America, turning it into the 58th islamofascist state.

Will Hinton at 11:14pm October 4
And now the nut-jobs come out of the closet.... :) read more »

Listen in as I interview David Houle futurist and author of the book The Shift Age.

David and I discuss future trends including the democratization of information and media, why the traditional definition of "recession" is irrelevant, peak oil, alternative energy, the end of the age of "unlimited", and David's hope for the future.

"We will survive collectively or die individually"

"We should try to be the parents of our future rather than the offspring of our past" read more »