Richardson presidential bid and the effect on the race overall
It has been 1 week since Governor Richardson gave up his effort to be the Democratic nominee and I have been doing a lot of soul searching and trying to figure out what I had been doing for the last 15 months. It has been very difficult to figure out what the point was. What about the hours I spent recruiting people online? Or the "sick" days I took to work on local events? Or the money I spent on phone bills and swag?
Was it all wasted?
My initial feelings were that it was all a waste. Sure, I made some nice contacts and had some unique experiences, but what did the Richardson candidacy achieve? It didn't achieve the goal it set out to - win the White House. Therefore it was a failure.
Yet, re-reading the Governor's departing speech, I realize that the Governor made some very important improvements in the national dialogue and positions of the remaining Democratic candidates.
Even though we were pushing the idea that 2013 is when Edwards, Clinton and Obama would remove soldiers from Iraq, the truth is that most are speaking of removing troops within 12-18 months. There is no longer any equivocation from Clinton about getting troops out. Obama is no longer just proposing to "get out in a better fashion than we got in." In the last debate all three candidates were tripping all over themselves to talk about removing troops from Iraq. Had Governor Richardson never entered the race, I doubt we'd be at this place in the conversation.
Secondly, the Governor was pushing a new "Manhattan Project" to get America off a carbon-based energy system to focus on renewables and efficiencies. It was a big hit with Iowa voters and suddenly became a key plank in the Obama and then Hillary stump speech. They are on board too. Now, they don't have the passion the Governor does for this sort of thing, but at least they are talking real ideas and real commitment to a new energy economy.
Finally, he chastised his fellow candidates when they turned away from policies and ideas and into personal attacks on one another. The Democratic party has traditionally been a circular firing squad during the primary process, but this time around the discourse is civil and focused on substance. Governor Richardson can't take the entire credit for this "high road", but without his early leadership on this issue, the race could have degraded very quickly.
A week after this all wrapped up, I've decided I'd do it all again, even knowing the outcome. And should Governor Richardson become the VP nominee, I'll be right back into the thick of things.
And it wasn't just me reflecting on this. The Albuquerque Tribune wrote an editorial: Bill Richardson was positive influence on campaigns of others that comes to the same conclusion I do.








Comments
Dems on the high road?
What campaign have you been watching, Expat? The Democratic campaign has been makred by civil discourse focused on substance? They've been taking the high road?? Sheesh....if this is all civil, I'd hate to see it when it turns. The last few weeks have been particularly ridiculous, with baseless claims of racism, support of Bush's policies, etc. etc. etc.
Not to take away from the focus of your post. You certainly can hold your head high for what Richardson did bring to the table. That being said, though, a civil Democratic primary doesn't appear to be among them.
Getting even better
Boy, the Democratic race is just getting more civil by the day. C'mon Expat...throw me a bone here. This is hysterical stuff! Sniping at each other during a debate like that? Have Bill Clinton chime in on the following day that they should keep going at it? Yes indeed....civility at its finest. :D
Lack of Governor Richardson has had a negative effect
AB-
I agree that the tone has turned for the worse since Governor Richardson has departed the race. The stupid race comments are detracting. The last debate was a total loss for the Democrats, who up to that point, had avoided looking like Republicans.
And as I think I've written on here before, President Clinton's behaviour is bothersome. I want my former Presidents to be statesmen and to stay out of the day-to-day political fight of the campaign.
There isn't much I like about President George H. Bush, but he wasn't running all over the country in 2000 stumping for his son and injecting himself into the debate.
The good news is that this will all be over on February 6th and the voting public will have months to forget these early primaries and will care a lot more about the head-to-head race between the Republican nominee and the Democratic nominee.
Post new comment