Recent blog posts
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Richard Doster about Safe At Home
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Todd Bouldin
- Good Will Hinton Interviews David Houle About The Shift Age
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Ken Mueller of WXPN
- Good Will Hinton Interviews S.E. Cupp about Why You're Wrong About The Right
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Bill Strickland about "Make the Impossible Possible"
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Andy Crouch About Culture Making
- Rep. Charles Rangel and Rent Control: Total Hypocrisy on Affordable Housing
- Good Will Hinton Interviews U.S. Congressman Hank Johnson (GA-4th)
- Comment Spam from the Changzhou Communist Consolidated Aliance Office
Recent comments
- I miss reading your
2 days 7 hours ago - Thanks for pointing this
1 week 2 days ago - Will:
I enjoyed an hour's
2 weeks 5 days ago - Hey Will, don't sleep on
3 weeks 2 days ago - Good conversation! nothing
3 weeks 4 days ago - The diminishing sense of
4 weeks 2 days ago - 1. I've read some excerpts
4 weeks 3 days ago - They were big fans of Stalin
4 weeks 4 days ago - Yeah, I just can't believe I
4 weeks 4 days ago - Wow, Michael Markowitz has
4 weeks 4 days ago









Does this illustration have no merit whatsoever?
Ben,
I think you realize this FDA example is just an illustration of my point. There are structural reasons why interventions have negative consequences. The above post actually began as an explanation of these structural problems, but I thought it got too confusing so I opted for an explanation by example instead.
Nevertheless, I don't think you've been fair even to my illustration. Perhaps my prediction that the loss of profits will hurt the industry is flawed on some accounts, but are you saying that everything in the FDA example (starting with European socialization) that has led to the situation we are in does not constitute some corroboration that interventions have negative consequences?