Recent blog posts
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Richard Doster about Safe At Home
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Todd Bouldin
- Good Will Hinton Interviews David Houle About The Shift Age
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Ken Mueller of WXPN
- Good Will Hinton Interviews S.E. Cupp about Why You're Wrong About The Right
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Bill Strickland about "Make the Impossible Possible"
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Andy Crouch About Culture Making
- Rep. Charles Rangel and Rent Control: Total Hypocrisy on Affordable Housing
- Good Will Hinton Interviews U.S. Congressman Hank Johnson (GA-4th)
- Comment Spam from the Changzhou Communist Consolidated Aliance Office
Recent comments
- I miss reading your
2 days 7 hours ago - Thanks for pointing this
1 week 2 days ago - Will:
I enjoyed an hour's
2 weeks 5 days ago - Hey Will, don't sleep on
3 weeks 2 days ago - Good conversation! nothing
3 weeks 4 days ago - The diminishing sense of
4 weeks 2 days ago - 1. I've read some excerpts
4 weeks 3 days ago - They were big fans of Stalin
4 weeks 4 days ago - Yeah, I just can't believe I
4 weeks 4 days ago - Wow, Michael Markowitz has
4 weeks 4 days ago









The Bigger Picture
The money the government will use to buy the drugs is acquired from taxation and deficit spending. Taxation is coercive and deficit spending demonstrates that the government does not even limit itself to tax revenues when it exchanges on the market. In short, it's entire existence on the market is supported through coercion.
This upsets price equilibrium. The intersection of supply and demand curves are predicated on voluntary exchange. Submarginal buyers don't buy when the price is at a certain level. The government is never a submarginal buyer because it will either increase taxes or deficits to get what it wants.
The appearance of voluntary exchange in this one tiny facet of the larger market is just that...an appearance. The underlying reality is much different.