Recent blog posts
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Richard Doster about Safe At Home
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Todd Bouldin
- Good Will Hinton Interviews David Houle About The Shift Age
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Ken Mueller of WXPN
- Good Will Hinton Interviews S.E. Cupp about Why You're Wrong About The Right
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Bill Strickland about "Make the Impossible Possible"
- Good Will Hinton Interviews Andy Crouch About Culture Making
- Rep. Charles Rangel and Rent Control: Total Hypocrisy on Affordable Housing
- Good Will Hinton Interviews U.S. Congressman Hank Johnson (GA-4th)
- Comment Spam from the Changzhou Communist Consolidated Aliance Office
Recent comments
- I miss reading your
2 days 7 hours ago - Thanks for pointing this
1 week 2 days ago - Will:
I enjoyed an hour's
2 weeks 5 days ago - Hey Will, don't sleep on
3 weeks 2 days ago - Good conversation! nothing
3 weeks 4 days ago - The diminishing sense of
4 weeks 2 days ago - 1. I've read some excerpts
4 weeks 3 days ago - They were big fans of Stalin
4 weeks 4 days ago - Yeah, I just can't believe I
4 weeks 4 days ago - Wow, Michael Markowitz has
4 weeks 4 days ago









Why Now?
Will,
Thanks for the insight. Not trying to pick on you, but am curious about what or when the scales finally tipped. Going into the 2000 election, Bush ran a good campaign. I think the people who voted for him (except maybe those who simply vote for a particular party) would agree. No, I did not vote for him, but based on the campaign he ran, he certainly had my attention. By 2004, we had the ability to evaluate Bush's campaign rhetoric with his action/inaction in office. Yet many of the reasons you express for 'regretting Bush' predate the 2004 election, so what changed for you from 2004 to now? How 'strong' was your support of Bush going into the 2004 election?
Also, you and I have discussed third party candidates and the difficulty third parties have in 'breaking into the game' (an easy cure is Instant Runoff Voting- which both republicans and democrats vehemently oppose as it could break their lock on government). So rather than not vote, why not vote for a third party candidate? Vote your dreams, not your fears? Granted, there may not be a third party candidate that represents your 'dreams' but given that no candidate is perfect, there should be someone that was close. Badnarik?
"Our democracy is but a name. We vote? What does that mean? It means that we choose between two bodies of real, though not avowed, autocrats. We choose between Tweedledum and Tweedledee." ~Helen Keller