I read this editorial in the New York Times on Sunday about Darfur. I was particularly struck by the last paragraph:
"The world’s leaders say they care desperately about Darfur’s suffering. But caring is not enough. What is needed is troops, equipment and a lot more diplomatic pressure on Sudan. The word of the United Nations is on the line, and so are the lives of Darfur’s people."
A few questions jump to my mind:
- What good did UN troops do in Rwanda?
- Are UN troops really the answer as there is a history of despicable actions such as rape on the part of these troops?
Recent comments
2 weeks 12 hours ago
2 weeks 13 hours ago
2 weeks 15 hours ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 3 days ago
3 weeks 4 days ago
3 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 6 days ago