With several former (including myself) and current teachers floating around this space, I'd be interested to hear reactions to this paragraph from Mickey Kaus' blog:
Is "merit pay" for good teachers nearly as important as making it easier to get rid of mediocre teachers? (You want to get hissed, tell that to the NEA.) In the successful organizations I've worked for, the positive incentives (in the form of unequal pay) weren't nearly as powerful as disincentives (in the form of fear that you might get fired if you didn't do your part). For one thing, negative incentives are highly compatible with teamwork. They get the whole organization going, including people who'll never be hot enough to get performance bonuses. They don't breed envy and backstabbing.
Recent comments
2 weeks 12 hours ago
2 weeks 13 hours ago
2 weeks 15 hours ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 3 days ago
3 weeks 4 days ago
3 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 6 days ago